← All client results
Utility and specialty trade

Scaling a utility contractor across 16 states on Acumatica: a case study

Commercial utility contractor serving major investor-owned utilities, with crews across 16 states.

By Rob Griffin, Founder · Updated

Bright Star Solutions

Watch: Bright Star on payroll, reporting and choosing a partner

A union contractor with complex payroll rules, Bright Star moved off QuickBooks and manual processes. What stood out in selection: Dominate built the demo on Bright Star’s own data, not a generic script.

  • Payroll that took several people a full day now takes a few hours
  • Timekeeping automation integrated directly with Acumatica
  • Real-time reporting that moves leadership from reporting results to influencing them
  • Growth without adding administrative headcount
16
states
350+
employees
~122%
revenue growth
In short

Bright Star Solutions, a commercial utility contractor serving major investor-owned utilities, grew to crews in 16 states and more than 350 employees with roughly 122% published revenue growth. Acumatica Construction Edition carried multi-state payroll, field time capture and equipment cost allocation without the administrative load scaling at the same rate.

Bright Star Solutions

Bright Star Solutions is a commercial utility contractor serving major investor-owned utilities, running crews across 16 states with more than 350 employees.

Rapid growth in this segment exposes the back office quickly. Crew-based field operations across state lines mean multi-jurisdiction payroll, unit-price billing against utility owners, and equipment moving between jobs constantly.

The question was never whether the work was there. It was whether the systems could carry the volume without a proportional increase in administrative headcount.

The challenge

Growth outpacing the back office

Multi-state crew operations put pressure on exactly the functions that break first: payroll across jurisdictions, field time capture, equipment cost allocation and unit-price billing.

Crew-based operations spread across 16 states
Multi-jurisdiction payroll and compliance exposure
Field time capture at distance from the office
Equipment cost allocation across constantly moving jobs
Growth requiring back-office headcount to keep pace
What we delivered

A platform sized for the growth curve

Acumatica Construction Edition configured for crew-based utility operations, with field capture and job cost structured to hold up as the geographic footprint expanded.

Acumatica Construction Edition
Job cost and equipment allocation for crew-based field work
Multi-state payroll and compliance handling
Field time capture coded to job and cost code at the source
Reporting built for a distributed operation

Capacity that grew faster than headcount

Bright Star scaled to 16 states and 350+ employees with roughly 122% published revenue growth, without the administrative load scaling at the same rate.

Multi-state operations

Crews across 16 states running on one system of record.

Field time at the source

Hours captured on a phone, coded to job and cost code as work happens.

Equipment costed to jobs

Ownership and operating cost charged by usage rather than absorbed as overhead.

Payroll compliance

Multi-jurisdiction payroll handled inside the system.

Growth absorbed

Roughly 122% revenue growth carried by the existing structure.

Visibility at distance

Leadership sees job performance without waiting on the field to report it.

The constraint on a growing contractor is almost never demand. It is whether the back office can carry the work the field is already winning.

Questions about this implementation

What makes multi-state utility contracting hard on an ERP?

Crew-based operations across state lines mean payroll and compliance across multiple jurisdictions, field time captured far from the office, and equipment moving between jobs constantly. Each of those breaks first when a company outgrows its systems.

How did Bright Star handle equipment costs?

Ownership and operating cost are charged to jobs by usage rather than absorbed into overhead. For equipment-intensive contractors this is frequently the largest single source of hidden margin loss.

Did back-office headcount grow with revenue?

No. Roughly 122% revenue growth and expansion to 16 states were absorbed by the existing structure rather than met with proportional administrative hiring.

More client results

Commercial electrical GCATS Read the story →
Commercial glazing Universal Glass Read the story →
Drywall and acoustical Drywall Interiors Read the story →
Clean energy Clean Energy Services Read the story →

Recognize your own operation in this?

Twenty minutes on what your close cycle and job cost reporting are costing you today. If the answer is to wait a year, that is what you will hear.

Start the conversation
1aThe other side